ABSTRACT
Background/Aims GCA is a systemic vasculitis predominantly affecting the large vessels that requires prompt diagnosis and management. This clinical audit aims to study the impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on our GCA service and to identify areas for improvement to ensure good and safe practice amid healthcare crisis. Methods We audited referrals for suspected GCA from February 2021 until September 2022 and measured our patient care against the BSR quality standards. We performed retrospective data collection from digital care record systems and analysed our data using the IBM SPSS Statistics version 29. Results 106 patients with suspected GCA were included, 73% were female and the mean age was 70 years. 75% of the referrals were from primary care. Main presenting symptoms were headaches (95.7%), scalp tenderness (69.6%), tongue/jaw claudication (52.2%), visual symptoms (47.8%), constitutional symptoms (43.5%) and polymyalgic symptoms (21.7%). 33% of patients were diagnosed and treated as GCA. Mean CRP was 23.9mg/L and mean plasma viscosity was 1.89mPA. The mean referral-to-specialist review time has reduced to 1.6 days, compared with 2.7 days pre-pandemic. All patients had vascular ultrasound but only 7.5% had a temporal artery biopsy (TAB), compared with 41% pre-pandemic. Table 1 compares expected and achieved BSR quality standards. Conclusion Changes in work pattern during the pandemic meant that the time from referral to specialist review was significantly reduced, by implementing twice weekly registrar-led 'Hot' clinics and reserving ad hoc slot(s) in on-call consultant's clinics for GCA referrals. We have ramped up our vascular imaging capacity for vascular ultrasound during the pandemic in response to reduced surgical operating capacity for TAB. Strategies to address areas for improvement identified in this audit include: (1) clear and timely communication with referrer about steroid initiation and dosage, at the time of referral;(2) improving communication with primary care, emphasising need for urgent Ophthalmology input in patients with suspected GCA-related visual symptoms, through updating our regional GCA guideline for primary care;(3) standardising and implementing a GCA review proforma or checklist in our department to ensure that the BSR GCA care bundle is being implemented and addressed at the earliest opportunity. (Table Presented).
ABSTRACT
Background: The mechanisms driving SARS-CoV-2 susceptibility remain poorly understood, especially the factors determining why a subset of unvaccinated individuals remain uninfected despite high-risk exposures. Method(s): We studied an exceptional group of unvaccinated healthcare workers heavily exposed to SARS-CoV-2 ('nonsusceptible') from April to June 2020, who were compared against 'susceptible' individuals to SARS-CoV-2, including uninfected subjects who became infected during the follow-up, and hospitalized patients with different disease severity providing samples at early disease stages. We analyzed plasma samples using different mass spectrometry technique and obtained metabolites and lipids profiles. Result(s): We found that the metabolite profiles were predictive of the selected study groups and identified lipids profiles and metabolites linked to SARS-CoV-2 susceptibility and COVID-19 severity. More importantly, we showed that non-susceptible individuals exhibited unique metabolomics and lipidomic patterns characterized by upregulation of most lipids -especially ceramides and sphingomyelin-and amino acids related to tricarboxylic acid cycle and mitochondrial metabolism, which could be interpreted as markers of low susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Lipids and metabolites pathways analysis revealed that metabolites related to energy production, mitochondrial and tissue dysfunction, and lipids involved in membrane structure and virus infectivity were key markers of SARS-CoV-2 susceptibility. Conclusion(s): Lipid and metabolic profiles differ in 'nonsusceptible' compared to individuals susceptible to SARS-CoV-2. Our study suggests that lipid profiles are relevant actors during SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis and highlight certain lipids relevant to understand SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Background: Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) is a systemic vasculitis involving large and medium-sized blood vessels. Treatment is with high dose glucocorticoids. Steroid-sparing agents and Tocilizumab (TCZ) are used for refractory or relapsing cases. NHS England requires all GCA patients to be discussed in a regional multidisciplinary team meeting (MDT) prior to commencing TCZ. TCZ has only been permitted for a maximum of one year;this time limitation was extended during the Covid-19 pandemic (1). The monthly virtual Bristol and Bath regional MDT started in November 2018. Objectives: We aimed to review: 1) Baseline data on all patients referred to the Bristol and Bath TCZ for GCA MDT, including demographics, clinical presentation and previous steroid-sparing agents used and 2) 12 month follow up data including number of completions, adverse effects, and fares on treatment. Methods: The TCZ MDT referral proforma, adapted from the NHS England Blueteq approval form, was reviewed for all patients referred. 12 month follow up data was obtained from clinic letters. Results: Baseline data Thirty-eight cases were referred between November 2018 and September 2021. Of these, 31 were approved for TCZ usage;100% fulflled the criteria for either refractory (n=11) or relapsing (n=20) disease. Mean age was 74 years and 74.2% were female. Average disease duration was 161.5 days for the refractory and 827.3 days for the relapsing group. 77.4% had cranial GCA, 48.4% had large vessel involvement, 45.2% had visual symptoms and 25.8% had ischaemic visual loss. The positive investigations were PET-CT (48.4%), temporal artery ultrasound (41.9%) and temporal artery biopsy (32.3%). 64.5% had trialled a steroid-sparing agent at time of referral (61.3 % metho-trexate, 9.7% azathioprine, 6.5% lefunomide), 35.5% had received intravenous methylprednisolone and 58% were receiving greater than 40mg prednisolone at the time of referral. Glucocorticoid adverse effects of osteoporosis, weight gain, cataracts and hypertension were each seen in 19.4%;whilst diabetes, neuropsychiatric symptoms and sleep disturbance were each reported in 16.1%. Those with ocular involvement tended to be referred earlier than those without (478.2 days vs 648.1 days), were referred on higher doses of glucocorticoids (71.4% vs 47.1% on ≥ 40mg) and had less steroid-sparing agents prior to referral. Follow up data In December 2021, a follow-up audit revealed 14/31 patients had completed at least 12 months of tocilizumab;5 of these had had an extension under Covid-19 exceptional guidance (mean duration of 5.2 months). Of the remaining 17: 3 patients had stopped early (1 death, 1 moved away, 1 due to adverse effects of headache and gastro-intestinal side effects), 4 had not started tocilizumab and 10 had not completed 12 months of treatment at that point. Adverse events in the 14 patients at 12 months included: liver abnormalities (2/14;14.3%), neutropenia (2/14;14.3%), thrombocytopaenia (1/14;7.1%), soft tissue infections (3/14;21.4%), urinary tract infection (1/14;7.1%) and lipid derangement (4/14 28.6%). One case of GCA relapse occurred on TCZ (mild headache and raised infammatory markers settled on small increase in prednisolone). After 12 months, mean prednisolone dose was 3mg (range 0-15mg). Conclusion: All patients approved for Tocilizumab in the GCA MDT fulflled NHS England criteria for either relapsing or refractory disease. The majority of cases had cranial disease, but almost half had either ocular or large vessel involvement, refecting a severe spectrum of disease. Cases showed a high burden of glucocorticoid toxicity. Follow up data suggests that TCZ was effective in allowing glucocorticoid weaning and disease control, but with some adverse effects. Future work to follow up patients after stopping Tocilizumab would be informative, as the twelve month limitation on treatment is likely to be re-instated.